[Cannabis medicines in pain management : Interim analysis of the survey accompanying the prescription of cannabis-based medicines in Germany with regard to pain as primarily treated symptom]. / Cannabisarzneimittel in der Schmerztherapie : Zwischenauswertung der Cannabisbegleiterhebung hinsichtlich der primär behandelten Symptomatik Schmerz.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, physicians who prescribe cannabis-based medicines at the expense of the statutory health insurance are obliged to take part in an accompanying survey. Pain was the most commonly reported diagnosis, making an interim evaluation for the indication of pain feasible. METHODS: Patient-related data was transmitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices via an online portal. In addition to demographic data, information on the treated disease or symptoms, the course of therapy, adverse reactions and treatment success were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 3138 data sets were evaluated for the main diagnosis of pain. Dronabinol was the most frequently (64%) prescribed cannabis-based drug. On average, patients were 57 years old and women and men were equally represented. Patients treated with cannabis flowers were significantly younger (48 years). The proportion of men in this group was 68% and 83% in the group of 18- to 40-year-olds. According to the assessment by treating physicians, pain was significantly improved in 35.5% of the patients. The most frequent side effects (fatigue, dizziness, nausea) corresponded to those already known from the product information of the cannabis-based medicinal products authorized under the pharmaceutical law. Treatment was discontinued in 1179 patients within 1 year. CONCLUSION: Physicians should comply with their legal obligation to participate in the accompanying survey. Pain is by far the most common diagnosis in cannabis drugs. For about one third of these patients, physicians reported a clear improvement in pain. Due to the amount of data hitherto and the limitations in the accompanying survey, the results should not be overinterpreted in terms of efficacy and should always be related to existing reviews. The lower age and higher proportion of men among patients treated with cannabis flowers were remarkable. At 37.6%, the overall drop-out rate was high. The most frequent side effects related to vigilance and are therefore highly relevant in terms of driving ability, work ability and risk of falling. For a differentiated evaluation of treatment success, more data needs to be available.

A Precision Medicine Initiative for Alzheimer's disease: the road ahead to biomarker-guided integrative disease modeling.

After intense scientific exploration and more than a decade of failed trials, Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a fatal global epidemic. A traditional research and drug development paradigm continues to target heterogeneous late-stage clinically phenotyped patients with single 'magic bullet' drugs. Here, we propose that it is time for a paradigm shift towards the implementation of precision medicine (PM) for enhanced risk screening, detection, treatment, and prevention of AD. The overarching structure of how PM for AD can be achieved will be provided through the convergence of breakthrough technological advances, including big data science, systems biology, genomic sequencing, blood-based biomarkers, integrated disease modeling and P4 medicine. It is hypothesized that deconstructing AD into multiple genetic and biological subsets existing within this heterogeneous target population will provide an effective PM strategy for treating individual patients with the specific agent(s) that are likely to work best based on the specific individual biological make-up. The Alzheimer's Precision Medicine Initiative (APMI) is an international collaboration of leading interdisciplinary clinicians and scientists devoted towards the implementation of PM in Neurology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience. It is hypothesized that successful realization of PM in AD and other neurodegenerative diseases will result in breakthrough therapies, such as in oncology, with optimized safety profiles, better responder rates and treatment responses, particularly through biomarker-guided early preclinical disease-stage clinical trials.

New opportunities and challenges in the assessment of drugs for atopic diseases.

Atopic conditions (atopic dermatitis, rhinitis, and asthma) belong to the most common noncommunicable diseases and are driven by chronic inflammatory reactions. They have a strong impact on the quality of life and represent a substantial and growing socio-economic burden. Interestingly, there is an increasing interest in the development of new therapeutic options with a number of biologics and small molecules targeting potential key mechanisms in atopic conditions. However, besides the safety issue, most of the new active substances are still evaluated according to the traditional efficacy paradigm focusing on the success in treating exacerbations and flares. Instead, the future approaches in drug development and assessment should rather concentrate on the long-term control of these diseases and consider their potential as disease-modifying strategies in the era of precision medicine. To reach this goal, a number of unsolved issues have to be addressed and consensually accepted by the stakeholders in this field. Thus, a successful and rapid development of new treatments requests a paradigm shift and a new way of thinking in the mind of physicians, pharmaceutical industry, regulators, and HTAs. This seems mandatory in order to optimize drug development and to facilitate the accessibility of new therapies to the growing population of patients suffering from atopic conditions on a global level.

[Requirements for drug approval and additional benefits assessment: Regulatory aspects and experiences]. / Anforderungen an Zulassung und Zusatznutzenbewertung von Arzneimitteln : Regulatorische Aspekte und Erfahrungen.

The early assessment of benefits of newly approved drugs with novel active substances or new applications, which came into force on 1 January 2011 still represents a challenge to all parties involved. This article highlights the definitions, regulatory requirements and interaction between drug marketing approval and early assessment of benefits in Germany. The constellation of an extensively harmonized European and even international drug authorization process with a predominantly national regulation of drug reimbursement situation inevitably causes friction, which could be markedly reduced through early joint advisory discussions during the planning phase for pivotal clinical trials. During the year 2015 the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) carried out 300 scientific advice procedures of which 34 were concerned with applications in the field of indications for the central nervous system (CNS). In comparison 98 advisory meetings were held by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) of which the BfArM provided advice in 12 instances and in 2 cases on CNS indications. Study design, endpoints and appropriate comparative therapies are the key issues in exchanges and discussions between the BfArM, the G­BA and applicants. Under these aspects the BfArM and G­BA promote an early and consistent involvement in early advice procedures regarding the prerequisites for drug approval and assessment of additional benefits.

PRECISION MEDICINE - The Golden Gate for Detection, Treatment and Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease.

During this decade, breakthrough conceptual shifts have commenced to emerge in the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) recognizing risk factors and the non-linear dynamic continuum of complex pathophysiologies amongst a wide dimensional spectrum of multi-factorial brain proteinopathies/neurodegenerative diseases. As is the case in most fields of medicine, substantial advancements in detecting, treating and preventing AD will likely evolve from the generation and implementation of a systematic precision medicine strategy. This approach will likely be based on the success found from more advanced research fields, such as oncology. Precision medicine will require integration and transfertilization across fragmented specialities of medicine and direct reintegration of Neuroscience, Neurology and Psychiatry into a continuum of medical sciences away from the silo approach. Precision medicine is biomarker-guided medicine on systems-levels that takes into account methodological advancements and discoveries of the comprehensive pathophysiological profiles of complex multi-factorial neurodegenerative diseases, such as late-onset sporadic AD. This will allow identifying and characterizing the disease processes at the asymptomatic preclinical stage, where pathophysiological and topographical abnormalities precede overt clinical symptoms by many years to decades. In this respect, the uncharted territory of the AD preclinical stage has become a major research challenge as the field postulates that early biomarker guided customized interventions may offer the best chance of therapeutic success. Clarification and practical operationalization is needed for comprehensive dissection and classification of interacting and converging disease mechanisms, description of genomic and epigenetic drivers, natural history trajectories through space and time, surrogate biomarkers and indicators of risk and progression, as well as considerations about the regulatory, ethical, political and societal consequences of early detection at asymptomatic stages. In this scenario, the integrated roles of genome sequencing, investigations of comprehensive fluid-based biomarkers and multimodal neuroimaging will be of key importance for the identification of distinct molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways in subsets of asymptomatic people at greatest risk for progression to clinical milestones due to those specific pathways. The precision medicine strategy facilitates a paradigm shift in Neuroscience and AD research and development away from the classical "one-size-fits-all" approach in drug discovery towards biomarker guided "molecularly" tailored therapy for truly effective treatment and prevention options. After the long and winding decade of failed therapy trials progress towards the holistic systems-based strategy of precision medicine may finally turn into the new age of scientific and medical success curbing the global AD epidemic.

[Interplay between marketing authorization and early benefit assessment of drugs]. / Zusammenspiel zwischen Zulassung und Nutzenbewertung von Arzneimitteln.

The early benefit assessment of newly approved drugs with new active substances or new applications that came into force on 1 January 2011 still presents a challenge to the parties involved. This article highlights the interplay between drug marketing approval and early benefit assessment. The constellation of a European, and even an international, largely harmonized, drug authorization process, with a mostly nationally regulated drug reimbursement situation causes inevitably friction, which could be reduced through joint advice discussions during the planning phase for pivotal studies. In 2013, the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) and the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) provided 439 scientific advice procedures, compared with 98 advice meetings held at the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), for 12 of which the BfArM or PEI provided written advice. The numbers of advice meetings held at the G-BA are increasing; however, the national competent authorities are involved in only a fraction of these. From the perspective of the national competent authorities, prompt and consistent involvement in the advice procedures regarding early benefit assessment would be useful and desirable.

[Medical devices. Regulatory framework and contribution of the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) to the safe application]. / Medizinprodukte. Regulatorischer Rahmen und Beitrag des BfArM zur sicheren Anwendung.

Medical devices are of great importance for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. With their broad range and interdisciplinarity, they represent both a very dynamic field of innovation and a significant sector of the economy. The European and thus the German Medical Devices Act aim in this context to make new medical devices for patients and users rapidly available while ensuring safety and performance at the same time. The main responsibility for this lies with the manufacturer. In addition, others are involved in a complex collaboration in the conformity assessment and also later in the marketing phase for the early identification, assessment and minimization of potential risks. This paper presents the legal framework for medical devices and the related roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders, especially the two federal agencies the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) and the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI). From the perspective of the BfArM the procedure and criteria for risk assessment of incident reports are explained and the experiences and wishes from regulatory practice are described. The active engagement of the BfArM to contribute knowledge from the incident report assessment within the relevant standards organisations and the medical profession is described using examples of medical devices from the field of out-of-hospital ventilation. The paper concludes with a look at future challenges, e.g. in combination products, IT networks and automatization, as well as on current developments to improve risk identification and assessment in a European context.

[Drug safety: challenge in an aging society]. / Arzneimittelsicherheit : Herausforderung in einer alternden Gesellschaft.

BACKGROUND: Within the context of the demographic change the proportion of the elderly in the overall population is steadily increasing. At the same time elderly patients are prescribed a disproportionately high number of medicines in comparison to younger patients. In the light of multimorbidity and polypharmacy which affect a relevant portion of the older population, drug safety is of particular importance. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In recent years, the prescription of psychiatric drugs to elderly patients was repeatedly subjected to regulatory assessment and recommendations, for example the safety of antipsychotics in patients with dementia. As only limited information is often available with respect to the risks of medicines in the elderly population, additional efforts are necessary for improvement of the database. In this context, the system of spontaneous reporting, e.g. the reporting of cases of suspected adverse drug reactions to the responsible authorities, plays an important role with respect to the additional knowledge to be gathered. By reporting observed adverse drug reactions as well as by the quality of the reported information, physicians are able to significantly influence the effectiveness of this system in a positive way. OUTLOOK: As medical care for the majority of the elderly population is provided by general practitioners, adequate longitudinal studies are of special interest for investigating drug safety in the elderly. This aim is being pursued by the AgeCoDe study (German study on aging, cognition and dementia in primary care patients), a prospective, multicentre observational study, which is being carried out within the German competence network of degenerative dementia (Kompetenznetz Degenerative Demenzen).

[Current state of knowledge and developments in the prophylaxis and acute treatment of migraine]. / Aktueller Kenntnisstand und Entwicklungen in der akuten und prophylaktischen Therapie der Migräne.

For the acute treatment of the headache phase of a migraine attack, a variety of different pharmacotherapeutic treatment options exist. These range from nonspecifically acting non-opioid analgesics (e.g., paracetamol) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory substances (e.g., acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac) to agents specifically interfering with the serotonin system (ergot alkaloids such as ergotamine and its derivatives, triptans). In patients with significant emesis co-occurring during an attack, additional antiemetics such as metoclopramide or domperidone may be administered. In migraine prophylaxis, largely divergent agents, e.g., ß-adrenoceptor antagonists, Ca-antagonists, or anticonvulsants, are commonly used. The diversity of these compounds may help the treating physician to tailor prophylactic treatment to the patient's individual needs. The treatment success of the individual patient is difficult to predict both in acute and prophylactic migraine treatment. Apart from contraindications or associated side effects of a particular substance, the individual patient's response to treatment is therefore a major determinant in selecting the suitable medication.

The Road Ahead to Cure Alzheimer's Disease: Development of Biological Markers and Neuroimaging Methods for Prevention Trials Across all Stages and Target Populations.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a slowly progressing non-linear dynamic brain disease in which pathophysiological abnormalities, detectable in vivo by biological markers, precede overt clinical symptoms by many years to decades. Use of these biomarkers for the detection of early and preclinical AD has become of central importance following publication of two international expert working group's revised criteria for the diagnosis of AD dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD, prodromal AD and preclinical AD. As a consequence of matured research evidence six AD biomarkers are sufficiently validated and partly qualified to be incorporated into operationalized clinical diagnostic criteria and use in primary and secondary prevention trials. These biomarkers fall into two molecular categories: biomarkers of amyloid-beta (Aß) deposition and plaque formation as well as of tau-protein related hyperphosphorylation and neurodegeneration. Three of the six gold-standard ("core feasible) biomarkers are neuroimaging measures and three are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analytes. CSF Aß1-42 (Aß1-42), also expressed as Aß1-42 : Aß1-40 ratio, T-tau, and P-tau Thr181 & Thr231 proteins have proven diagnostic accuracy and risk enhancement in prodromal MCI and AD dementia. Conversely, having all three biomarkers in the normal range rules out AD. Intermediate conditions require further patient follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at increasing field strength and resolution allows detecting the evolution of distinct types of structural and functional abnormality pattern throughout early to late AD stages. Anatomical or volumetric MRI is the most widely used technique and provides local and global measures of atrophy. The revised diagnostic criteria for "prodromal AD" and "mild cognitive impairment due to AD" include hippocampal atrophy (as the fourth validated biomarker), which is considered an indicator of regional neuronal injury. Advanced image analysis techniques generate automatic and reproducible measures both in regions of interest, such as the hippocampus and in an exploratory fashion, observer and hypothesis-indedendent, throughout the entire brain. Evolving modalities such as diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and advanced tractography as well as resting-state functional MRI provide useful additionally useful measures indicating the degree of fiber tract and neural network disintegration (structural, effective and functional connectivity) that may substantially contribute to early detection and the mapping of progression. These modalities require further standardization and validation. The use of molecular in vivo amyloid imaging agents (the fifth validated biomarker), such as the Pittsburgh Compound-B and markers of neurodegeneration, such as fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) (as the sixth validated biomarker) support the detection of early AD pathological processes and associated neurodegeneration. How to use, interpret, and disclose biomarker results drives the need for optimized standardization. Multimodal AD biomarkers do not evolve in an identical manner but rather in a sequential but temporally overlapping fashion. Models of the temporal evolution of AD biomarkers can take the form of plots of biomarker severity (degree of abnormality) versus time. AD biomarkers can be combined to increase accuracy or risk. A list of genetic risk factors is increasingly included in secondary prevention trials to stratify and select individuals at genetic risk of AD. Although most of these biomarker candidates are not yet qualified and approved by regulatory authorities for their intended use in drug trials, they are nonetheless applied in ongoing clinical studies for the following functions: (i) inclusion/exclusion criteria, (ii) patient stratification, (iii) evaluation of treatment effect, (iv) drug target engagement, and (v) safety. Moreover, novel promising hypothesis-driven, as well as exploratory biochemical, genetic, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging markers for use in clinical trials are being developed. The current state-of-the-art and future perspectives on both biological and neuroimaging derived biomarker discovery and development as well as the intended application in prevention trials is outlined in the present publication.

[Personalised medicine. Aims and challenges]. / Personalisierte Medizin. Zielsetzungen und Herausforderungen.

Personalised medicine will address the clinical and pathophysiologic complexity of many diseases with the aim of developing therapeutic strategies more adapted for selected individuals or patient subgroups in order to improve efficacy and safety of medicinal products. This biomarker-based approach will potentially allow identification of populations at risk for chronic and life-threatening diseases and to design early intervention strategies. Personalised medicine will lead to a substantial move from costly and often inefficient health care to a hopefully more cost effective, more targeted and more preventive approach addressing participative patients with increased health literacy. Thus, it provides the basement for an ultimate paradigm shift of modern medicine, away from a "reactive" medicine to a more "proactive" and personalised health care, so-called "P4 medicine".

[Authorization procedure of clinical trials with medical devices. First practical analysis of the BfArM]. / Genehmigungsverfahren von klinischen Prüfungen mit Medizinprodukten. Erste Praxisanalyse des Bundesinstitutes für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM).

The 4th amendment of the Medical Device Law introduced the authorization procedure for clinical trials with medical devices. The Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices ("Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte", BfArM) has now drawn the first substantial interim balance on the basis of daily practice in order to describe results achieved by applications of clinical trials with medical devices. Overall, realization of the new authorization procedure of clinical trials is well underway. This empirical practical analysis of the first 405 applications points out further possibilities for improvements for future applicants. Furthermore, initial figures demonstrate the cooperative relationship with national and international applicants. Because the by far largest percentage of the premarket clinical trials with medical devices in the European Community are conducted in Germany (28%), the analysis also provides a comparison with other European countries in order to detect differences in specific areas as the result of the implementation of Directive 2007/47/EC.

Atropine-sensitive hippocampal θ oscillations are mediated by Cav2.3 R-type Ca²âº channels.

Hippocampal theta oscillations are key elements in numerous behavioral and cognitive processes. Based on the dualistic theory of theta oscillations, one can differentiate between atropine-sensitive and atropine-insensitive theta subtypes. Urethane-induced atropine-sensitive theta oscillations are driven by muscarinic signal transduction pathways through G protein q/11 alpha subunit (Gα(q/11)), phospholipase ß( ») (PLCß( »), inositol trisphosphate (InsP3), diacylglycerole (DAG), and protein kinase C (PKC). Recent findings illustrate that Ca(v)2.3 Ca²âº channels are important targets of muscarinic signaling in the hippocampus mediating plateau potential generation, epileptiform burst activity, and complex rhythm generation in the septohippocampal network. To investigate the physiological implications of Ca(v)2.3 Ca²âº channels in hippocampal theta oscillations we performed radiotelemetric intrahippocampal (cornu ammonis (CA1)) recordings in urethane (800 mg/kg, i.p.) and atropine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) treated Ca(v)2.3⁺/⁺ and Ca(v)2.3⁻/⁻ mice followed by wavelet analysis of EEG data. Our results demonstrate that Ca(v)2.3 ablation, unlike PLCß1 deletion, does not result in complete abolishment of urethane-induced theta oscillations and that both mean and total theta duration is not significantly inhibited by subsequent atropine treatment, indicating that Ca(v)2.3 Ca²âº channels are important mediators of atropine-sensitive theta. Although theta frequency remained unchanged between both genotypes, the temporal characteristics of theta distribution, that is, theta architecture were significantly affected by the loss of Ca(v)2.3 Ca²âº channels. Our data suggest, for the first time, that Ca(v)2.3 voltage-gated Ca²âº channels (VGCC) are an important factor in septohippocampal synchronization associated with theta oscillation.

Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease therapeutic trials.

The development of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease requires innovative trials with large numbers of subjects and long observation periods. The use of blood, cerebrospinal fluid or neuroimaging biomarkers is critical for the demonstration of disease-modifying therapy effects on the brain. Suitable biomarkers are those which reflect the progression of AD related molecular mechanisms and neuropathology, including amyloidogenic processing and aggregation, hyperphosphorylation, accumulation of tau and neurofibrillary tangles, progressive functional, metabolic and structural decline, leading to neurodegeneration, loss of brain tissue and cognitive symptoms. Biomarkers should be used throughout clinical trial phases I-III of AD drug development. They can be used to enhance inclusion and exclusion criteria, or as baseline predictors to increase the statistical power of trials. Validated and qualified biomarkers may be used as outcome measures to detect treatment effects in pivotal clinical trials. Finally, biomarkers can be used to identify adverse effects. Questions regarding which biomarkers should be used in clinical trials, and how, are currently far from resolved. The Oxford Task Force continues and expands the work of our previous international expert task forces on disease-modifying trials and on endpoints for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials. The aim of this initiative was to bring together a selected number of key international opinion leaders and experts from academia, regulatory agencies and industry to condense the current knowledge and state of the art regarding the best use of biological markers in Alzheimer's disease therapy trials and to propose practical recommendations for the planning of future AD trials.